This is tricky for Obama. Apparently she said her campaign is sending the letter today to the Obama campaign. Obama already went on FNS and said no more debates before May 6th.
http://www.politico.com/...
"We're not going to have debates between now and Indiana," he said.
Update: Here's the letter from Maggie Williams, the Clinton campaign manger. What strikes me first is their completely ludicrous argument:
I understand that Senator Obama has raised the point that there have already been more than 20 debates this election cycle. However, only four of those have been between Senator Obama and Senator Clinton.
Remember after Super Tuesday as Solis-Doyle, now fired campaign manager, desperately asked for a debate? At that time the argument was there had only been one. So after this next debate there will have only been 5, then 6, on an on. It's got to end some time
Senator Clinton and Senator Obama will participate in a 90-minute debate in an open public forum. Just the two of them -- no questioners, no panelists, no video clips. One candidate would speak for two minutes, then the other, alternating back and forth all the way through the debate. Their discussion – not any pre-set rules – would determine how long they spend on one subject before moving on to another. Such a debate would range across all of the challenges, large and small, we face as a nation or it could focus on the most significant issue we face today, -- the economy.
We can readily agree on a host, a place, a date, and a broadcaster or series of broadcasters.
I don't like the format.
The original Lincoln-Douglas worked like this:
Each debate had this format: one candidate spoke for an hour, then the other candidate spoke for an hour and a half, and then the first candidate was allowed a half hour "rejoinder." The candidates alternated speaking first.
She needs free airtime for sure but I'm on the fence as to whether Obama should give it to her.
[Update x2]: Axelrod on CNN Ballot Bowl: No deal.
Comments are closed on this story.